ROVQIX builds custom logistics software — customer tracking portals, dispatch and scheduling tools, carrier and partner API integrations, and exception dashboards — designed around the exceptions that make up most of the operational workload.
Every logistics system handles the happy path. The value is entirely in what happens when a delivery fails, an address is wrong, or a carrier's API stops responding at 3am.
Designed for the mess
Survives carrier outages
Where it earns its cost
Data checked, not trusted
Self-service status so your team stops answering the same phone call forty times a day.
Assignment, routing and capacity tools built around how your planners actually make decisions.
Rate, booking, label and tracking integrations with timeouts, retries and circuit breakers as standard.
Surfacing only the shipments needing human attention, which is the actual daily job.
Controlled access for customers, agents and subcontractors with scoped visibility per party.
Performance, cost and SLA reporting your team currently assembles manually every month.
In most operations, the majority of staff time goes to a minority of shipments — the ones that went wrong. Software that automates the smooth cases and offers nothing for the exceptions does not reduce workload; it just moves where people work around it.
For the dispatch view and active deliveries, usually yes. For everything else, periodic updates are cheaper and sufficient.
| Use case | Update frequency | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Dispatch board | Real-time | Decisions are made on it live |
| Active delivery tracking | Real-time or near | Customer-facing expectation |
| Customer portal status | Every few minutes | Nobody watches it continuously |
| Management reporting | Hourly or daily | Decisions are not made per minute |
| Historical analysis | Batch | Real-time adds cost, not value |
Where a documented API, database replica or scheduled export exists, yes. We confirm this during discovery — some older systems are genuinely difficult, and finding that out early matters.
Usually not. If the core system works, integrating with it and building the missing pieces around it carries far less risk than replacement, and the business case for a rewrite rarely survives real costing.
Yes — mobile-first interfaces that tolerate poor connectivity, queueing actions locally and syncing when the connection returns. Assuming constant connectivity is a common and costly mistake here.
Parallel running with the existing process for an agreed period, then a phased cutover by depot, region or customer. Big-bang rollouts in live operations are rarely worth the risk.
Indicative ranges in USD. Every engagement is quoted to a written scope before work starts, so the number you approve is the number you pay.
$2,500 – $6,000
2–3 weeks
Best for: Mapping the real process before building
$20,000 – $70,000
10–24 weeks
Best for: Dispatch, tracking and partner portals
from $1,800 / month
Ongoing
Best for: Systems the operation depends on
How we think about this work, in more depth.
Logistics
A 30-minute call, then a written proposal with scope, price and timeline within two to three working days. No retainer required to get a real number, and no obligation if the answer is that we are not the right fit.